November 19th, 2009
Supreme Court rejects Tokyo Two appeal for disclosure of key evidence
Sarah King
After weeks and weeks of awaiting, the decision by the Supreme court of Japan on whether to allow the disclosure of evidence was made and it was not in our favour. The following press release was released from Japan by our team working closely on the T2 case……our thoughts are with Junichi and Toru, and the team…….
Tokyo, Japan, 18 November 2009 – The Tokyo Supreme Court today denied a special appeal for disclosure of evidence in the trial of Greenpeace activists Junichi Sato and Toru Suzuki, upholding a string of human rights violations committed against them and reinforcing the flawed nature of Japan’s justice system.
The first appeal was rejected on 28 September by the Sendai High Court, prompting the new special appeal to the Supreme Court on 5 October. This asserted that if the prosecutor did not disclose this evidence it would be a violation of Article 37(2) of the Japanese Constitution, as well as Article 14(3)(b) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which both guarantee the right to a fair trial.
The rejection of the appeal will have significant ramifications on the case, as it deprives Sato and Suzuki, known as the ‘Tokyo Two’, of important means to prove their innocence. The two were seeking disclosure of evidence that would have helped prove the existence of an embezzlement scandal covered up by the government, and therefore the justification for their actions in exposing it. Today’s decision turns this into a case about a ’theft‘, ignoring the broader embezzlement issue, as well as the selfless motives of the defendants.
Over 3,000 lawyers, individuals and organisations, including Amnesty International(1), wrote to the Supreme Court in support of the special appeal, with Amnesty International Director of Policy Michael Bochenek noting that “the government’s prosecution of these two activists is an unjustifiable interference with their rights to freedom of expression and association.”
International law guarantees the right to a fair trial, and this requires both parties be in an equal position to make their case.
“[T]he defence must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to prepare and present its case on a footing equal to that of the prosecution,” writes Bochenek. “The prosecution must disclose all material information to the defence.”
Similar failures to disclose evidence have earned Japan repeated criticism(2) from UN human rights bodies, and the trial of the Tokyo Two shows that this problem remains.
“Fundamental to a fair trial is the ability of the defence to access all relevant evidence held by the prosecution, which in Junichi and Toru’s case will demonstrate their innocence,” said Jun Hoshikawa, Executive Director of Greenpeace Japan. “By rubber-stamping the censorship of this evidence, the Supreme Court has endorsed the continued violation of Junichi and Toru’s human rights, and demonstrated that Japan’s legal system is geared for convictions rather than justice.”
Supreme Court rejects Tokyo Two appeal for disclosure of key evidence
Categories: GMO, Greenpeace, Oceans
Share this post
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed
November 25th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
What are the Japanese hiding? Probably that there is NO research done at all! Boycot Japanese goods! Hit them where it hurts them the most…FINANCIALY!!!!!
November 26th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
If there was a major effort to boycott their cars to North America, because of this case, I am sure a change would take place. Now in particular is a good time as Japanese prosperity is at a low ebb. I guess one can only dream of success.